Bail v. Hartman
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. George R. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
The appellee, Francis M. Hartman, as trustee-in bankruptcy of the copartnership firm of Benbrook & Donovan, brought suit in the district court of Pima County to recover from the appellants, Adolph Bail and E. P. Drew, the possession of certain personal property, or the value thereof. The appellee in his complaint alleged that the property sought to be recovered was an asset of said copartnership firm of Benbrook & Donovan, and that the defendants,, within four months prior to an adjudication of bankruptcy against said firm, made in the district court of the first judicial district, had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- West Co. v. LeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- New Lamp Chimney Co. v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Leidigh Carriage Co. v. StengelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Chapman v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Green River Deposit Bank v. CraigDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mayhew v. BrislinArizona Supreme Court · 1910
- Southern Pacific Co. v. RicheyArizona Supreme Court · 1910
- Machomich Mercantile Co. v. HickeyArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Webb v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913