Mayhew v. Brislin
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District, in and for Yuma County. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
This was an action commenced by the plaintiff and appellee, D. J. Brislin, against the defendant and appellant, Felix Mayhew, to recover for services rendered by the plaintiff as middleman in effecting an optional contract of sale of certain mining properties in Yuma county, Arizona. A verdict in the sum of $2,000 was rendered against the defendant, upon which verdict judgment was duly entered. A motion for new trial was made, which was denied, and thereupon this appeal was taken.
The first and second assignments of error criticise the following rulings of the trial court:“ Q. Now, Mr.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gilder v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Forsyth v. DoolittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Blake v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Barter v. County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1886
- Goldman v. SoteloArizona Supreme Court · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- Levine v. BarryWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Machomich Mercantile Co. v. HickeyArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Montgomery v. EmpeyWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Nelson v. ReinhartNevada Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.