Legal Opinion

Webb v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1913No. Criminal No. 325PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yavapai. Prank 0. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SHÜTE, J.

The appellant, W. D. Webb, was indicted by the grand jury of Yavapai county on the third day of May, 1911, for the crime of grand larceny, committed on December 12, 1910, by stealing a neat animal, the property of the J. W. Sullivan Cattle, Land and Water Company, a corporation. He was tried and found guilty. Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order overruling his motion for a new trial.

He assigns as error, first, the admission of the articles of incorporation of the J. W. Sullivan Cattle, Land and Water Company; second, the admission of a bill of sale from J.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Spring Valley Water Works v. San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. People v. WittyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. GarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duke v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kerley Chemical Corp. v. Producers Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Machomich Mercantile Co. v. HickeyArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State Ex Rel. Bryant v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API