Burton v. Zion's Cooperative Mercantile Institution
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
The sole question presented by this appeal is the plaintiff’s claim that the trial court should have granted a mistrial and called a new jury because of statements made by a prospective juror, one Hugh Barker, in connection with the voir dire examination of the jury panel.
The pertinent portions of the record are:
“Judge Van Cott: Do you feel that if you were in the position of this plaintiff that you would get a fair and impartial trial if you submitted this case to eight men like yourself, Mr. Barker?
“Mr. Barker: Judge, I had, I was threatened with a case of this kind at one…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mower v. MowerUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Hepworth v. Covey Bros. Amusement Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
- Lund v. Third Judicial Dist. Court in & for Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Palfreyman v. Bates & Rogers Const. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1945
- Redd v. Airway Motor Coach Lines, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. ButterfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RobertsonUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
- Jacobson v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. WachUtah Supreme Court · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.