Legal Opinion

Hepworth v. Covey Bros. Amusement Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1939No. 6051PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Justice.

James Hepworth was a paid guest at a public dance. The ballroom was owned and operated by the Covey Brothers Amusement Company. Hepworth sued the Company for damages arising out of false imprisonment. He recovered a verdict of $1,000. On motion for a new trial the lower court gave him the choice of accepting a $500 judgment, or submitting to the new trial. He accepted the $500 judgment. The Amusement Company has appealed. There is substantial evidence in the case to support the following:

At the dance, Hepworth met two friends, Abel and Peck, the latter a minor. While they were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. RitchieUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Eleganti v. Standard Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Lund v. Third Judicial Dist. Court in & for Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Skeen v. SkeenUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Whittaker v. SanfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Morrison v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Burton v. Zion's Cooperative Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Wheat v. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. United States v. KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API