Lund v. Third Judicial Dist. Court in & for Salt Lake County
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
The plaintiff in this proceeding seeks review of the proceedings of the trial court upon matters arising, as the facts will disclose, subsequent to the denial of a motion for a new trial. Plaintiff contends the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in entertaining and acting upon the matters complained of. The parties here are plaintiff and defendants respectively, as they were below, with the addition of Hon. Herbert M. Schiller, the judge who presided and entertained and passed upon the matters about which complaint is made, as an additional defendant.
The history of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harrison v. HarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1901
- Felt v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Luke v. ColemanUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Tooele Improvement Co. v. HoffmanUtah Supreme Court · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beasley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
- Johnson v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Burton v. Zion's Cooperative Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Wasatch Oil Refining Co. v. Wade, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Hepworth v. Covey Bros. Amusement Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.