Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Russell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1913No. 7760PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Delta District Court. — Hon. Sprigg Shackleford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Fred Russell, defendant in error, sued H. E. Perkins, plaintiff in error, to recover a commission which he claims to have earned through securing a purchaser, on terms satisfactory to Perkins, for certain property belonging to the latter.

The complaint charges that Perkins, claiming to be the owner of six hundred acres of land near Madera in Gunnison county, also about 10,000 ewes, 6,000 sheep, 250 bucks and 8 horses, together with improvements, chattels and machinery on the land, did on September 15th, 1909, employ plaintiff Russell to secure a purchaser for same at the price of $78,000, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. SchermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Colorado Mortgage & Investment Co. v. ReesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. Finnerty v. FritzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  4. Buckingham v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. Salazar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dickey v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. National Surety Co. v. Queen City Land & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  3. Morgan v. Howard Realty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. North York Land Associates v. Byron Oil Industries, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API