Legal Opinion

Dickey v. Waggoner

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 16, 1941No. 14,767PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young

The parties to this litigation are here in reverse order of their appearance in the district court, and for convenience will be herein designated as plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff sued for a real estate broker’s commission and recovered judgment for $750 in the district court. Defendant seeks a reversal on the sole ground that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict of the jury and the judgment based thereon.

The evidence, as is usual in such cases, is conflicting. We have examined the record with care, and we have not confined our examination to the abstract and supplemental…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moses v. . BierlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Finnerty v. FritzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  3. Buckingham v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Colburn v. SeymourSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  5. Spaulding v. SaltielSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ikeoka v. KongHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. MR Mansfield Realty, Inc. v. SunshineColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. The Costilla Land Company v. Clarence W. Robinson, Clarence W. Robinson, Cross-Appellant v. The Costilla Land Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. McCullough v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  5. Thompson v. WolffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API