National Surety Co. v. Queen City Land & Mortgage Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court, Hon. James H. Teller, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill
The defendant in error, hereafter called the plaintiff, secured judgment against the plaintiff in error, hereafter called the defendant, upon a contractor’s bond. Two trials were had, each to a jury, in both of which the verdict was for the plaintiff. In his opening brief, counsel for defendant says:
“Practically all of the testimony at both trials was directed to an issue whether in the construction of the project, the plans and specifications had been so materially departed from that the surety on the bond was relieved. This particular issue was given to each jury under correct instructions,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Preston v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
- Kahnweiler v. Phenix Ins. Co. of BrooklynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Minto v. LambertColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Federal Surety Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Home Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Midwest Mutual, Inc. v. HealdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.