Legal Opinion

Buckingham v. Harris

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1887PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Larimer County. An action brought by Jesse Harris to recover his commission as a real estate broker, claimed to have been earned by finding a purchaser for land belonging to Charles G. Buckingham, defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Stallcup, C.

Appellee was plaintiff below, and recovered judgment. The questions presented for consideration by the twenty errors assigned for the reversal thereof may be arranged as follows: First. Was the evidence sufficient to warrant the verdict and judgment? Second. Was there error in the instructions to the jury given by the court, or in the refusal to give those, requested by appellant? Third. Did the court err to the prejudice of the appellant in the rulings on the introduction of evidence at the trial?

First, to the evidence. As to the employment of appellee to sell this four hundred…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. McGavock v. WoodliefSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Moses v. . BierlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Coleman's Ex'r v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
  5. Mooney v. . ElderNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hamburger & Dreyling v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Wray v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  3. Castner v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  4. Central Copper Co. v. KlefischArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Colburn v. SeymourSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API