Finnerty v. Fritz
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe Cotmty. The facts are stated in the opinion. The plaintiff in the court below had judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
The most important questions raised by the assignment of errors in this case involve the subject or agency, *175and the principles which must control the conduct of an agent in transactions between himself and his employer, and in his transactions with third persons in respect to the subject-matter of his agency.
The general principles of law applicable to real estate brokers appear to be well settled, and rules defining their duties have! been laid down and sanctioned by a long course of j udicial decisions, but difficult questions often arise whether or not a given state of ^facts bring the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rice v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Stewart v. MatherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Moses v. . BierlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Raisin v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Scribner v. CollarMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Hamburger & Dreyling v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Buckingham v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Glenn v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Manders v. CraftColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.