Legal Opinion

McCarthy, to Use v. Bridgeport Boro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1930No. Appeal, 75PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaeeee,

C. J. McCarthy entered into a contract with the Borough of Bridgeport for the building of a sewage system. He defaulted in the work and it was taken over by the surety on his bond, the National Surety Company, in pursuance of the demand of the municipality. At the time it assumed the undertaking, there was due to McCarthy by the borough $3,084.22. This amount had been assigned by McCarthy to the surety company. It made demand upon the borough for payment of the sum named, the borough refused to respond and this action was brought to compel payment. The case was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Lesley v. KiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Philadelphia v. McLindenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Patterson v. New Eagle BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sundheim v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. National Bank of Germantown & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Mock, Trustee v. BechtelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Kiski Area School District v. Mid-State Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Montgomery County v. Ambler-Davis Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API