Legal Opinion

Lesley v. Kite

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1899No. Appeal, No. 397PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal, No. 397, Jan. T., 1897, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1897, No. 1171, dismissing bill in equity. Demurrer to bill in equity. The material averments of the bill are set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was decree dismissing the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Chief Justice Stbbbett,

This bill, against J. Sellers Kite & Company and others, was filed by the plaintiffs on behalf of themselves, and of all other creditors who, on account of the subject-matter thereof, might join therein and contribute to the expenses thereof.

After making certain averments of fact, as the basis of their claim for equitable relief, the plaintiffs pray that a suitable person be appointed to act as receiver of the fund now in the hands of the city and for other purposes thereinafter set forth, and that the court will order and direct:

“ 1. That said J. Sellers…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kline v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Philadelphia v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Philadelphia v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Sundheim v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. American Surety Co. of New York v. FinletterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API