Legal Opinion

Kiski Area School District v. Mid-State Surety Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 2008No. 27 WAP 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*446 OPINION

Justice GREENSPAN.

We consider whether a broad release of a contractor that is silent as to any release of the contractor’s surety nonetheless discharges the surety. Appellant, Mid-State Surety Corporation (“Mid-State”), appeals from the Superior Court’s decision which reversed the trial court and held that the Kiski Area School District (the “School District”) could pursue a performance bond claim against Mid-State, notwithstanding the School District’s release of, and final payment to, bonded contractor Lanmark, Inc. (“Lanmark”). We reverse the Superior Court and reinstate the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Northeastern Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. General Equipment Manufacturers v. Westfield InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Reliance Insurance v. Penn Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Keystone Bank v. Flooring Specialists, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eastern Steel Const. v. International FidelitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Eastern Steel Const. v. International FidelitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Kiski Area School District v. Mid-State Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Newman, L. v. DeSalvo, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API