Rudy v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Plaintiff seeks reinstatement of the verdict and argues that it may be supported by any one of three propositions: (1) Proof of the first carrier’s receipt of the animals in good condition and delivery by defendant in diseased condition established negligence unless defendant proved absence of negligence; (2) the evidence was such as to permit the jury to find, upon balancing the probabilities, that the plaintiff’s cattle contracted their disease from bacteria in the cars left there by diseased cattle previously transported; (3) defendant’s failure to produce records showing names of previous…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Feldstein v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Vilter Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Stocker v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
- Pfister & Vogel Leather Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Laridaen v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ernst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Carr v. Amusement, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Lux Art Van Service, Inc., a California Corporation v. Art PollardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Rudy v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Mastercraft Paper Products, Inc. v. FreightwaysWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972