Legal Opinion

Ernst v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1969No. State 46PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The sole issue presented on this review is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas of guilty.

In State v. Reppin (1967), 35 Wis. 2d 377, 385, 151 N. W. 2d 9, this court adopted the “manifest injustice” test, whereby the defendant should be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty if he is able to prove by clear and convincing evidence that his plea was made under any of the following nonexhaustive situations:

“ ‘ (1) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed to him by constitution, statute, or rule;
“‘(2) the plea was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. StricklandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  3. Nachtigall v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Peterson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Nelson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API