Legal Opinion

Stocker v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 26, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The correctness of the charge must be determined on the situation presented by the record at the time it was given, or at most before the discharge of the jury. Facts then known neither to the court nor to the jury are immaterial on that issue. There is, therefore, no merit in the plaintiffs’ exception to the refusal of the court to permit proof of facts which had not appeared at the trial.

The exception to the charge was general. It is now claimed, however, that the court in effect directed the jury to disregard any argument which might have been made upon the defendant’s failure to call as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arbuckle v. TempletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Maszczenski v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Beery v. BreedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. International Harvester Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Meyer v. McDonnellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API