Legal Opinion

Laridaen v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1951PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

It appears from a careful examination of the record that there is nothing pointing to the cause of the dog’s condition when it arrived at Mauston except the statement of the Mauston veterinarian that it was his opinion that the dog must have received a blow. His testimony permits of no more than conjecture as to the cause. The record is in such state that neither the jury, the court, nor we may attribute the dog’s condition to any particular cause.

The common-law rule is that, in the absence of special contract, the liability of a common carrier for the loss or injury of property received by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carchidi v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Whitcomb v. KeatorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Calvetti v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. John Schroeder Lumber Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Worachek v. Stephenson Town School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Sheely v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Rudy v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Dombeck v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Dombeck v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API