In re the Claim of Pencola
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
We affirm. Whether a claimant had good cause to leave employment is a factual determination within the province of the Board and its decision will not be disturbed when supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Mkhitaryan [Commissioner of Labor], 86 AD3d 888, 888 [2011]; Matter of Heller [Paragon Motors of Woodside, Inc. — Commissioner of Labor], 83 AD3d 1229, 1229 [2011]). Here, the employer testified that claimant called in several hours before his scheduled shift and, upon reporting that he had transportation problems, claimant was offered a ride to the job site, but declined.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of ZaydmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of HellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of MkhitaryanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of MorarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of CruseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re WedgleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re WedgleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of NeelyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of NeelyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of PersaudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.