Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Zaydman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 15, 2011PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Claimant worked as a receptionist in the employer’s dental office for approximately 3V2 months. She was discharged from her position when the employer’s business advisor discovered that she had removed $500 in petty cash from the office without permission. She was initially denied unemployment insurance benefits but, following a hearing, an administrative law judge later determined that she was entitled to receive benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, however, reversed this decision and concluded that claimant was disqualified from *1193receiving benefits because she was terminated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re LumbrazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of AndreaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of HorsfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re the Claim of PencolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of BartonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of BrimageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.