Legal Opinion

THR Minerals, LLC. v. Robinson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2017No. 20160062PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEvers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Charles Robinson, Paul Robinson, and William Robinson appeal from an amended judgment, granting summary judgment in favor of THR Minerals, LLC, and deciding ownership of mineral and royalty interests in certain property. We conclude the assignment of royalty at issue is unambiguous, and the district court did not err as a matter of law in construing the assignment to decide the ownership of the subject mineral and royalty interests between the parties. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In August 2014 THR filed an amended complaint to quiet title to mineral and mineral royalty ownership…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Nygaard v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. A.G. Golden v. SM Energy CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Markgraf v. WelkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Northern Oil & Gas, Inc. v. CreightonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hallin v. Inland Oil & Gas CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Wilkinson v. Board of University and School Lands of the State of N.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Wilkinson v. Board of University and School Lands of the State of N.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Continental Resources, Inc. v. P&P Industries, LLC INorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Petro-Hunt v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API