Legal Opinion
Shark v. Thompson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 4, 1985No. Civ. 10845PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Justice.
Evan Shark appeals from a judgment dismissing his action against Wheeler, Wolf, Peterson, Schmitz, McDonald & Johnson, P.C. (hereinafter “Wheeler firm”) and Robert 0. Wefald, individually. 1 We affirm.
Shark, an experienced businessman and realtor, was for an extended period of time involved in business dealings with Michael and Carmen Thompson. This business relationship was terminated in 1977, and Shark loaned a sum of money to the Thompsons and took a promissory note and mortgage in return. The mortgage, on property denoted by the parties as the “1721 property,” lies at the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jerome H. Lemelson v. The United States, the Bendix Corporation and Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Patterson v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Louise Parrott, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeffrey Parrott, Deceased v. Max v. Wilson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Phyllis S. Hamm v. Members of the Board of Regents of the State of Florida, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. WinklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Slaubaugh v. SlaubaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Vorachek v. Citizens State Bank of LankinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Williston Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Steiger Tractor, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.