Legal Opinion

Hallin v. Inland Oil & Gas Corporation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2017No. 20170145PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶ 1] Joan Hallin, John Hallin and Susan Bradford (collectively Hallin and Bradford) appeal from a judgment in favor of Inland Oil & Gas Corporation. The district court interpreted oil and gas leases and concluded they were unambiguous and transferred all of Hallin and Bradford’s mineral interests at issue to Inland. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 2007, Hallin and Bradford each leased to Inland mineral interests they owned in 160 acres of land in Mountrail County. The leases provided Hallin and Bradford leased to Inland “all that certain tract of land situated in Mountrail County.”

[¶3]…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. A.G. Golden v. SM Energy CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Markgraf v. WelkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. First National Bank v. FlathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Nichols v. GoughnourNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. THR Minerals, LLC. v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Flaten v. CoutureNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Pemberton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. G & D Enterprises v. LiebeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Tergesen v. Nelson HomesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Agri Indus., Inc. v. FransonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API