Legal Opinion

Scroggins v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 22, 1993No. CR 92-887PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Justice.

Herbert Hawkins and the appellant, George Scroggins, were charged with delivery of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, in exchange for money.

After a jury trial, Mr. Scroggins was found guilty and sentenced to forty years in the Department of Correction and fined $50,000. Mr. Hawkins was found not guilty.

In particular, Mr. Scroggins questions the admissibility of an informant’s prior recorded testimony and the sufficiency of the evidence. He also presents numerous other assignments of error. Inasmuch as his arguments are meritless, we affirm the trial court.

SUFFICIE…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. David v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Bragg v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Proctor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Diffee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API