Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 10, 1977No. CR76-164PublishedCited by 193 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Roce Smith, Justice.

At a bifurcated trial the jury first found the appellant, Roy Lee Dixon, guilty of possession of heroin with intent to deliver, as charged. The jury then found Dixon to be a habitual criminal, with three previous felony convictions, and imposed a 40-year sentence. The principal question is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the finding that Dixon intended to deliver the heroin that was found in his possession.

The witness Andol testified that after having pleaded guilty to a drug charge he volunteered to assist undercover officers in making a purchase of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Graves v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Hartman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

3Cited by193 opinions

  1. McCambridge v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API