Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1984No. CR 84-121PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

We granted the petition of Cullen and Sandra Harris to review the decision of the Court of Appeals [See Harris and Harris v. State, 12 Ark. App. 181, 672 S.W.2d 905 (1984)], to decide whether an appellant who has challenged the sufficiency of the evidence, along with other assignments of error, is entitled to have that issued decided when the case is reversed and remanded on other grounds. The Court of Appeals declined to address the sufficiency argument since the case was reversed for procedural errors. That position was reaffirmed by a supplemental opinion denying…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pollard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Lukach v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Burmingham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API