Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 9, 1988No. CR 88-33PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant appeals from his conviction of second degree battery which resulted from a jury finding that he intentionally or knowingly, without justification, caused injury to Anthony Ward, the six-year-old son of appellant’s girlfriend. Appellant raises five points for reversal, four of which involve either the constitutionality, construction or application of A.R.E. Rule 803(25). His remaining point involves the trial court’s denial of appellant’s mistrial motion regarding certain remarks made by the prosecutor in his opening argument. We affirm the trial court’s ruling on…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Ricarte v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Strode v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Scroggins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API