Legal Opinion

State v. Cromwell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1991No. 10-89-00870; CA A64510PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*656DE MUNIZ, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He asserts that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a warrantless search of the passenger compartment of his pickup truck. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute: On January 19, 1989, Oregon State Police Officers Collins and Houlihan responded to a report of a prowler near a residence in Eugene. The resident told the officers that she had heard noises in the yard and then saw a vehicle drive down the road toward a boat landing, where the road…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. KockOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. TallmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. BurrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. GetzelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API