Legal Opinion

State v. Kock

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1986No. CC 84-03-3411-C; CA A31589; SC S32171PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Defendant petitions this court to reverse his conviction for theft of a package of diapers from his employer’s store, claiming that the Court of Appeals erred when it upheld the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress crime evidence seized from his automobile. He asserted that the police lacked probable cause and exigent circumstances to conduct a warrantless search of his car or to seize the package, that they lacked probable cause to arrest him and that the search of his car and seizure of the package were not reasonably incident to a valid arrest. The Court of Appeals held that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. OppermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1998

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API