Legal Opinion

State v. Nicholson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 27, 1988No. 10-86-01624 86 CR 0119 TM CA A42364 (Control), CA A42590PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

These criminal cases are consolidated for appeal. The state seeks reversal of orders of two trial courts suppressing evidence seized from a parked car and from rural premises. ORS 138.060(3). Both courts found that the initial seizure of the car was unlawful and that the later search, conducted pursuant to a warrant, was tainted. We affirm.

The evidence shows 1 that defendant Nicholson rented a motel room in Springfield. Other persons visited him there. When Nicholson checked out, he was accompanied by a second person. A maid found a coat that Nicholson had left behind. On examining it, she…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CromwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. BarnumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. SundermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. ParrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API