Legal Opinion

Shenk v. Stahl

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1905No. 5,237PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Erom Howard Circuit Court; J. F. Elliott, Judge. Action by Adam Stabl and others against Reuben Shenk and another. Erom a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, P. J.

Appellees instituted this action in the Howard Circuit Court against appellants, and the cause was tried on an amended complaint in three paragraphs.

The separate demurrer of Reuben Shenk to each paragraph of the complaint was overruled, and this ruling is here assigned as error.

The complaint was answered in three paragraphs, the first being a. general denial. Other pleadings, not necessary for us here to notice in the decision of this case, were filed. Trial by the court, finding and decree in favor of appellees. The substance of the first paragraph of tire amended complaint may be stated as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lowther Oil Co. v. Miller-Sibley Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State ex rel. MacKenzie v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cassell v. CrothersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Heller v. DaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HolmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Fall Creek School Township v. ShumanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Laudeman v. Russell & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Barrett v. DorrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Ramage v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API