Laudeman v. Russell & Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Elkhart Circuit Court; J ames 8. Dodge, Judge. Action by Edward S. Laudeman, as administrator of the estate of Jessé Leeper, deceased, against Russell & Co. and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
After the averment of the death of decedent, and appellant’s appointment as administrator of the decedent’s estate, it is alleged that defendants, Rnssell & Co. and the Arbuckle-Ryan Company of Ohio are organized corporations under the laws of Ohio, engaged in the manufacture and sale of portable steam-engines; that the Ar-buckle-Ryan Company of Indiana is engaged in the sale, exchange and setting up of boilers and engines manufactured by Russell & Co. and the Arbuckle-Ryan Company of Ohio; that the Arbuckle-Ryan Company of Ohio and the Arbuckle-Ryan Company of Indiana were and are general…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Wellington v. Downer Kerosene Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Norton v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Losee v. . CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Holland Furnace Co. v. NauracajIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
- Crane Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Queen v. Patent Scaffolding Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Chambers v. WhelenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Hart v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.