Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Holm

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1948No. 36,951PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This is an action to quiet title to real estate. The plaintiffs recovered and the defendants appeal.

All that needs to be said with respect to the pleadings is that they raise the issue whether defendants are still the owners of an undivided one-half interest in the minerals in and under the tract of land involved by virtue of a mineral deed conveying such an interest to the person from whom they acquired their interests for a term of fifteen years and so long thereafter as oil or gas was produced from the property in paying quantities or had…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Watson v. RochmillTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Elliott v. Crystal Springs Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Richards v. ShearerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Brashear v. RabensteinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Midwest Oil Corporation v. WinsauerTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wagner v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API