Legal Opinion
State v. Richardson
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 1994No. C-930219PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
The defendant-appellant, Tavis Richardson, appeals from his conviction for drug abuse (R.C. 2925.11) following a no-contest plea. 1 In his two assignments of error, which challenge the trial court’s order overruling his motion to suppress, Richardson contends that: (1) his stop for a minor traffic offense was a pretext to search for drugs, and (2) the trial court’s order to exclude the testimony of certain witnesses precluded his ability to challenge the race-based drug profile allegedly used by the arresting officer. Neither assignment of error is well…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CarlsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. FrenchOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.