State v. Davis
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.
Defendant-appellant Roger Davis appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting him of obstructing official business in violation of R.C. 2921.31. We affirm the judgment.
Two uniformed police officers in a marked cruiser were driving in the Clifton area of Cincinnati, Ohio, when they observed Davis crossing the street in front of them. At trial, the officers testified that they believed that Davis had crossed the intersection against the light. They decided to issue a citation for a pedestrian violation. When they pulled the cruiser over, one of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. RichardsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. KatesOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. EasterlingOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Brooklyn v. KaczorOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.