Legal Opinion

Dayton v. Erickson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 1995-0859PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 3.] CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLANT, v. ERICKSON, APPELLEE. [Cite as Dayton v. Erickson,

1996-Ohio-431.] Criminal law—Where police officer stops vehicle based on probable cause that traffic violation has occurred, the stop is not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution even if the officer had some ulterior motive for making the stop. __________________ Where a police officer stops a vehicle based on probable cause that a traffic violation has occurred or was occurring, the stop is not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. United States v. Gregory B. Bloomfield, Also Known as Earl Marcum JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Cecil FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. State v. Cochran, Ca2006-10-023 (7-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. GartrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. McClellanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API