Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Erickson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 95-859PublishedCited by 425 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The court of appeals determined that a “pretextual” traffic stop is constitutionally invalid. The court of appeals defined a “pretextual stop” as one in which a police officer “uses a minor violation of the law to make a stop which the officer would not otherwise make in order to conduct a search or an interrogation for an unrelated, more serious offense for which he does not have the reasonable suspicion necessary to support a stop.” The court of appeals’ majority upheld the trial court’s findings that the traffic stop in this case was a pretext because (1) the police officer did not have an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Gregory B. Bloomfield, Also Known as Earl Marcum JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Cecil FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Gregory Lynn Cummins, United States of America v. Timothy Akins, A/K/A Michael MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by425 opinions

  1. State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BatchiliOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court · 1996

420 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API