City of Dayton v. Erickson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The court of appeals determined that a “pretextual” traffic stop is constitutionally invalid. The court of appeals defined a “pretextual stop” as one in which a police officer “uses a minor violation of the law to make a stop which the officer would not otherwise make in order to conduct a search or an interrogation for an unrelated, more serious offense for which he does not have the reasonable suspicion necessary to support a stop.” The court of appeals’ majority upheld the trial court’s findings that the traffic stop in this case was a pretext because (1) the police officer did not have an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Gregory B. Bloomfield, Also Known as Earl Marcum JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Cecil FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Gregory Lynn Cummins, United States of America v. Timothy Akins, A/K/A Michael MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by425 opinions
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BatchiliOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
420 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.