Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Redevelopment Agency v. Zwerman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1966No. Civ. 27714; Civ. 28136, 28137PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Plaintiff instituted an action in eminent domain, seeking to condemn certain property of defendant Zwerman, located in Santa Monica. The case was consolidated for trial with similar actions against defendants Harry and Ida Weiss, in which plaintiff sought to condemn two parcels of land involved in the same development project. After a jury trial, verdicts were returned and entered fixing the sum of $57,500 as the fair market value of the Zwerman land and its improvements, $59,000 as the fair market value of one parcel of the Weiss land and $87,500 as the fair mar ket value of a second parcel.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Kansas City & Grandview Railway Co. v. HaakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Rauscher Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. City of Los Angeles v. DeaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. San Bernardino County Flood Control District v. SweetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Housing Authority of Little Rock v. RochelleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. State v. LaceyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. LangleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API