Legal Opinion

State v. Lacey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 16, 1973No. 906-2PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

In this condemnation action the state seeks to acquire approximately 31 acres of land in Pierce County from a tract of 237 acres known as the Lacey Farm. The state appeals from a jury verdict in favor of the landowners in the sum of $345,000.

The assignments of error raise the following issues: (1) Did the trial court err in determining as a matter of law that the land in question comprised five separate tracts instead of a single larger parcel of land as contended by the state? We agree with the trial court’s determination. (2) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in excluding the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CalkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Seattle v. WaldWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. KodamaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. United States v. 55.22 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Yakima County, Washington, William J. Fox, Jr., Et Ux.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. LangleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Felton v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Doolittle v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re JefferiesUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. State v. LaceyWashington Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API