Legal Opinion

Housing Authority of Little Rock v. Rochelle

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 23, 1970No. 5-5387PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

On direct appeal Housing Authority of the City of Little Rock asserts that a jury award of compensation to appellees in the amount of $45,000 in an eminent domain proceeding was excessive and not supported by substantial evidence. We do not agree that the evidence supporting the verdict was insubstantial.

The property taken was a lot 50 feet wide and 140 feet deep on which there was an apartment building. It is located at Louisiana and Eleventh Streets in Little Rock. It fronts on Louisiana, is five blocks from the downtown shopping area and one block from the First…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bergeman v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. State Highway Commission v. NunesOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. StupentiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Ex parte ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  5. Desha v. Independence County Bridge District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ray Edwards and Louise Edwards, His Wife, Individually, and on Behalf of a Class Similarly Situated v. Arkansas Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. VickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Brookshire v. AdcockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Lamar Advantage Holding Co. v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Ozark Gas Transmission Systems ex rel. Ozark Gas Pipeline v. BarclayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API