San Bernardino County Flood Control District v. Sweet
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.
Plaintiff brought this action in eminent domain to acquire (1) a perpetual easement for the installation and maintenance of a storm drain conduit; (2) fee title to a small parcel for an appurtenant intake facility; and (3) a temporary construction easement along the perpetual easement. Following a jury trial on values, an interlocutory judgment was entered for a net award to the owner of $28,472. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
Plaintiff has filed an extensive brief setting forth a number of alleged errors occurring during trial. Basically most of plaintiff’s contentions are simply…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- City of Baldwin Park v. StoskusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.