Legal Opinion

San Bernardino County Flood Control District v. Sweet

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1967No. Civ. 8321PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.

Plaintiff brought this action in eminent domain to acquire (1) a perpetual easement for the installation and maintenance of a storm drain conduit; (2) fee title to a small parcel for an appurtenant intake facility; and (3) a temporary construction easement along the perpetual easement. Following a jury trial on values, an interlocutory judgment was entered for a net award to the owner of $28,472. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

Plaintiff has filed an extensive brief setting forth a number of alleged errors occurring during trial. Basically most of plaintiff’s contentions are simply…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. City of Baldwin Park v. StoskusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API