Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1999No. 66210-0PublishedCited by 293 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is the companion case to State v. Mc-Corkle, 137 Wn.2d 490, 973 E2d 461 (1999). Like McCorkle, the question in this appeal is whether failure to specifically object at sentencing to the classification of prior out-of-state convictions waives the issue on direct appeal. Holding that failure to specifically object waived the issue on appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the sentence. We reverse and, based on the facts of this case, remand.

FACTS

Petitioner, Earl Lee Ford, pleaded guilty in King County Superior Court to six counts of first degree theft and one count of attempted theft in the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States v. Janice Weston, A/K/A Janice WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Daniel FaticoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by293 opinions

  1. State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. HunleyWashington Supreme Court · 2012

288 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API