Legal Opinion
In Re the Personal Restraint of Hews
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1983No. 48452-0, 48501-1PublishedCited by 188 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
Petitioner Iain C. Hews seeks review of a Court of Appeals opinion which held a Personal Restraint Petition collaterally attacking the validity of his guilty plea was procedurally barred by In re Haynes, 95 Wn.2d 648, 628 P.2d 809 (1981).
The State seeks review of a Court of Appeals opinion which granted a Personal Restraint Petition and vacated the guilty plea of Samuel P. Evans, relying on In re Keene, 95 Wn.2d 203, 622 P.2d 360 (1980).
Since two Divisions of the Court of Appeals have reached inconsistent results on similar issues, we granted review. We reverse the Court of Appeals in both…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. HolsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- John Henry Casey v. Robert MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.