Bin Ding v. Lazaro
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.
The defendant state of Connecticut 1 appeals from judgment of the trial court denying its motion to dismiss count three of the plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly concluded that sovereign immunity did not deprive it of subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff's statutorily required notice of claim under the state highway defect statute, General Statutes § 13a-144, 3 was not patently defective in its description of the place of injury. 4 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bresnan v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Zotta v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Schaap v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Ormsby v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Filippi v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.