Legal Opinion
Filippi v. Sullivan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 22, 2005No. SC 17068PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The plaintiff, Mark Filippi, brought this defective highway action under General Statutes § 13a-144*31 against the named defendant, James F. Sullivan, the commissioner of transportation (commissioner),2 seeking damages for injuries that the plaintiff had sustained in an automobile accident allegedly caused by the commissioner’s negligent failure to post lane closure signs on a portion of Interstate 95 in East Lyme. The commissioner filed a motion to dismiss the action on the ground that the notice submitted by the plaintiff to the commissioner as required by § 13a-144 was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Bresnan v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Cox v. AikenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- McIntosh v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Kozlowski v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Perez v. D AND L TRACTOR TRAILER SCHOOLConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.