Legal Opinion

City Consumer Services, Inc. v. Peters

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1991No. 880453PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

Defendant Vera Peters appeals from a summary judgment in favor of a nonforec-losing junior lienholder, plaintiff City Consumer Services. City sued Peters on her promissory note after the real property securing the note had been exhausted by a senior lienholder’s foreclosure action. The main issue presented is whether a debtor may invoke Utah Code Ann. § 78-37-1, the “one action rule,” to bar a nonforeclosing junior lienholder from suing on its note.

In April 1981, Peters was the owner of a condominium in Salt Lake County subject to a trust deed in favor of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Weisel v. Hagdahl Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. Carr v. Home Owners Loan Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Parson Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Smith v. Four Corners Mental Health Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Kepler v. SladeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Wells Fargo Credit Corp. v. TolliverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API