Legal Opinion

Kepler v. Slade

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1995No. 22234PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant Oliver Kepler (Kepler) appeals the trial court’s order entering summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Wendy Slade (Slade). The sole issue on appeal is whether an earlier foreclosure action, in which both Kepler and Slade were defendants, bars Kepler from instituting a separate action against Slade to recover on a personal note, which Slade executed in conjunction with a deed of trust on the foreclosed property. We hold that under the doctrine of res judicata, a judgment in a prior foreclosure action does not bar a subsequent lawsuit to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Central Penn Nat'l Bank v. Stonebridge Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  5. Nosker v. Trinity Land Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. JohnstonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Gonzales v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Aluia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Royal Palm Corporate Center Ass'n v. PNC Bank, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Bank of Sun Prairie v. Marshall Development Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API