Rochford v. Joyce
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Peter J. Rochford, Carmen De-Santo, Andrew Gretchokoff 1 and Ralph Elliot, file this action individually and on behalf of a class of plaintiffs who were denied pension benefits by defendants allegedly due to various restrictive vesting requirements. These restrictive practices include a requirement to accumulate twenty years of covered employment; the requirement to attain a certain age when a worker attains twenty years of covered employment; not allowing or only allowing limited break-in-service periods; and not allowing workers with…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cowles v. Bank WestMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Healy v. Axelrod Construction Co. Defined Benefit Pension Plan & TrustDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Lehman v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006
- Hohenegger v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Miller v. MagneTek, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.