Legal Opinion

Rochford v. Joyce

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 16, 1990No. 88 C 7776PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Peter J. Rochford, Carmen De-Santo, Andrew Gretchokoff 1 and Ralph Elliot, file this action individually and on behalf of a class of plaintiffs who were denied pension benefits by defendants allegedly due to various restrictive vesting requirements. These restrictive practices include a requirement to accumulate twenty years of covered employment; the requirement to attain a certain age when a worker attains twenty years of covered employment; not allowing or only allowing limited break-in-service periods; and not allowing workers with…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cowles v. Bank WestMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Healy v. Axelrod Construction Co. Defined Benefit Pension Plan & TrustDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  3. Lehman v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006
  4. Hohenegger v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
  5. Miller v. MagneTek, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API