Legal Opinion
Lehman v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided August 8, 2006No. 06-4020-CV-C-NKLPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAUGHREY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant United Parcel Service’s (“UPS”) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 7]. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be granted in part and denied part.
I. Background
Plaintiff Lary Lehman (“Lehman”) alleges the following facts in his complaint which the Court assumes to be true for the purposes of UPS’s Motion to Dismiss. Lehman began working for UPS in October 1992. On March 12, 2004, he was injured, through no fault of his own, while driving a UPS truck. Following his injury, Lehman was examined by a Workers Compensation Physician…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lora Stuart v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Saul MacKlin v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc. Saul MacKlin v. Drivers, Chauffeurs and Helpers, Local Union No. 639Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duckworth v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- In Re Enron Corporation SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Newby v. Enron Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- IN RE TURKEY ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Jennifer Scott MixsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.