Healy v. Axelrod Construction Co. Defined Benefit Pension Plan & Trust
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
FACTS
Plaintiff William P. Healy (“Healy”) brought this action under Section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, seeking declaratory and other equitable relief. In a four count complaint, Healy claims he is entitled to benefits in excess of $150,000 from a pension plan (“the Plan”) set up by defendant Axelrod Construction Company (“Axelrod Construction”), and alleges breach of fiduciary duties, interference with…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Gavalik v. Continental Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- William J. Kross v. Western Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Perkins v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- John L. Hill, Francine Barnes, Franchot Barnes, Francesca Barnes, and Glory Celestine v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Ludwig v. NYNEX Service Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Ehrlich v. HoweDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Adamczyk v. Lever Bros. Co., Div. of ConopcoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Chilcote v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of WisconsinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.